MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042564542

The Prediabetes Detection and Physical Activity Intervention Delivery (PRE-PAID) Project

2016· other· en· W7042564542 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Trillium Foundation
KeywordsPrediabetesGlycemicGlycated hemoglobinAerobic exerciseType 2 diabetesPsychological interventionPhysical fitnessIntervention (counseling)Physical activity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prediabetes is a prevalent condition which is a precursor to type 2 diabetes (T2D) and physical activity is known to counter T2D. Given the potential for alleviating health care expenditures through the prevention or delay of T2D, targeting individuals with prediabetes using physical activity intervention is a critical research question. The aim of this project was to; i) identify persons with prediabetes and thus at high risk for developing T2D, ii) engage individuals with prediabetes in community-based, culturally-preferred physical activity classes led by culturally-matched instructors with the goal of improving glycemic control and iii) investigate how two modes of laboratory-based aerobic exercise intervention (high intensity intervals versus continuous moderate intensity) impact glycemic control in persons with prediabetes. \n \nParticipants were recruited in various ethnic communities known to have high prevalence rates of T2D. Critical blood biomarkers and measures of physical and physiological fitness were assessed at different time points to ascertain the effectiveness of both community-based physical activity classes and two modes of laboratory-based exercise. The results of this project show that the PRE-PAID risk questionnaire coupled with point-of-care testing of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) are an effective tool for identifying persons with prediabetes who are at high risk for T2D. Individuals, who participated in community-based culturally matched physical activity classes, experienced improved glycemic control evidenced by reductions in A1C after 3 and 6 months plus improvements in resting blood pressure, combined hand grip strength and aerobic fitness after 6 months. There were no differences between the laboratory-based aerobic exercise interventions of high intensity intervals vs. continuous moderate intensity for any of the measured outcomes. However, the participants who underwent both laboratory exercise modes experienced significant improvements in glycemic control, beta cell function, waist circumference and aerobic fitness following 3 months of supervised exercise. This research provides evidence for early detection of persons with prediabetes and strategies for improving glycemic control and physical plus physiological fitness in this population. The observed improvements could potentially help prevent or delay the onset of T2D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)French-language works237,207