MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7042591180

Phosphorus Distribution, Mobility, Crop Uptake and Removal Across Four Prairie Farm Fields in Saskatchewan

2025· article· en· W7042591180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorusSnowmeltEutrophicationCropSurface runoffFertilizerSoil waterSpatial variability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil test phosphorus (STP) represents the amount of phosphorus that is available for crop uptake. In surface soil, STP is also correlated to the potentially mobile fraction that interacts with runoff. It is desirable to maintain available phosphorus in the soil to ensure sufficiency for crop needs and to avoid excessive phosphorus that can result in labile P moving off-field with snowmelt and rainfall runoff, resulting in the eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs. There is a lack of knowledge about the causes in variation and distribution of STP across farm field landscapes in western Canada. At the same time, there is a need to take into consideration the spatial variation of available phosphorus in the field when making site - specific nutrient management prescriptions. In this thesis research, soil labile phosphorus forms, soil properties, crop yield, phosphorus uptake and concentrations in simulated snowmelt phosphorus were assessed in samples taken across the landscape from four farm fields in southern Saskatchewan. Soil labile P was found to be more consistently and strongly influenced by landscape position (upper < mid < lower) in landscapes with greater slope gradients such the site located near Central Butte SK with knob and kettle topography. In contrast, sites with gently undulating landscapes and with minimal slope such as those located near Clavet and Outlook SK had soil P levels that were more influenced by differences in crop yield, soil properties, land management and fertilizer application patterns across the landscape. Headlands were identified in this study as areas where excess soil labile P may be encountered due to overlap when P fertilizer is applied. Landscape position was associated in some cases with variation in soil P sorption capacity, and snowmelt P concentrations were not significantly related to landscape position. The assessments of labile soil P used in this thesis research: modified Kelowna extractable P and anion resin exchangeable P were found to be suitable predictors of runoff risk in the landscape. Observed higher crop yield and crop P uptake and removal in depressional areas of the landscape accompanied with reduced P fertilizer rates and erosion control are strategies that may be employed to reduce labile P levels and runoff risk in these landscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→