POST-TERRORIST ATTACKED AREAS The case of Regjeringskvartalet in Oslo. Effects on the security and liveability of the city
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On July 22, 2011, the Government Quarter of Oslo and the island of Utøya – to the northwest of the city – where political activities for young people were developed – suffered one of the major terrorist attacks in the modern history of Europe. Several years after the event, this metropolis is still affronting its consequences. The construction of the new Government Quarter and the lack of security measures around the city is making a change in the way of planning the urban future of Oslo. Therefore, this research will explore one of the significant current challenges in the Norwegian capital: the coexistence of security measures with the liveability in the new development of the Government Quarter and the city in general terms. The main goal of this study will be to understand the insights into the security and liveability of different actors involved in the new development. Moreover, through the combination of three methods – GIS visualisation, qualitative interviews and planning document analysis – the current investigation will be carried out to answer the main research question and three subquestions elaborated to understand the problem from three different approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".