Prendre en compte les questions éthiques soulevées dans la pratique du travail social ::quels enjeux et quelles pistes pour la formation initiale ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'éthique comme espace de réflexion et de vigilance face aux défis de l'intervention est au coeur de l'agir et de la posture professionnels. La délibération éthique qui met en perspective les normes, les valeurs, les enjeux organisationnels, gestionnaires, voire politiques, d'une situation permet de vivifier la pensée et l'action et contribue à la construction de positionnements professionnels porteurs de sens. Cet article propose une réflexion sur les enjeux de la formation à l'éthique en contextes québécois et suisse et à partir de la mise en place d'un comité local du travail social et du développement social dans la région Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.062 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".