MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042631418

Proposta de um modelo para a geração de forças nas Forças Armadas

2020· other· pt· W7042631418 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositório Comum (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal) · 2020
Typeother
Languagept
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRoy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of IowaEgg Farmers of Canada
KeywordsNucleofectionArticular cartilage damageLiquationFusible alloyGestational periodDysgeusia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo da presente investigação é propor contributos para a otimização de um modelo de geração de forças nas Forças Armadas que assegure o cumprimento dos compromissos internacionais, no exterior do território nacional. O estudo iniciou-se com a análise do modelo de planeamento e geração de forças nacionais destacadas, no sentido de detetar eventuais lacunas e disfunções, no respetivo ciclo anual, na perspetiva de obter contributos para a sua otimização. De seguida, compararam-se as características dos modelos das organizações internacionais, bem como de países aliados, que podem contribuir para otimizar para o modelo nacional. Com base nas lacunas e disfunções encontradas e na comparação dos modelos referenciados, foi possível selecionar contributos suscetíveis de serem adaptados ao modelo nacional. Na investigação utilizou-se um processo de raciocínio do tipo indutivo e uma estratégia qualitativa, adotando o estudo de casos múltiplos como desenho de pesquisa. Como principal resultado da investigação, apresentam-se contributos ao nível da finalidade, dos processos e dos recursos, numa proposta otimizada de modelo que sistematiza de forma rigorosa, o planeamento anual e geração de forças nacionais destacadas, conjugando as capacidades e maximizando os recursos disponíveis, de forma a contribuir decisivamente para a afirmação da política externa de Portugal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositório Comum (Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal)French-language works237,207