Portrait socioéconomique du territoire Anjou–Montréal-Est : \nCentre local d’emploi de Saint-Léonard.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le portrait tracé dans ce chapitre est celui du territoire Anjou–Montréal-Est, composé de deux parties : les territoires de l’arrondissement d’Anjou de la ville de Montréal ainsi que de la ville de Montréal-Est. Avec 44 713 personnes (données intégrales, voir la note ci-dessus) en 2006, soit 2,4% de la population de l’île de Montréal, le territoire Anjou–Montréal-Est a vu sa population croître de 7,6% depuis 2001 (41 562), plus de trois fois plus que dans l’ensemble de l’île (2,2%). Près du quart des personnes sont nées hors Canada sur le territoire Anjou–Montréal-Est (22,6%), soit moins que les 33% que l’on retrouve sur l’ensemble de l’île de Montréal. Précisons que les personnes nées hors Canada ne forment que 7,4% des effectifs de Montréal-Est. De plus, si seulement 16,4% de la population a déclaré être issue des minorités visibles, contre 25% pour l’île, ils ne sont que 7,2% sur le territoire de Montréal-Est...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".