MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042678248

Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Genus Physaria in North America

2023· article· en· W7042678248 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogeneticsPolyploidTaxonBrassicaceaeTaxonomy (biology)GenusSubspecies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physaria is a genus of ~108 species belonging to family Brassicaceae that is predominantly distributed in Western North America, but one species occurs in Arctic Russia and Northern Canada and several species occur in South America. Regardless of the vast number of species in the genus, the genus lacks a well-resolved phylogeny representing many taxa, partially because phylogeny reconstruction is complicated by the fact that many species of Physaria vary in chromosome numbers and ploidy levels. In chapter 1, we review how polyploids are formed and become established and summarize what is known about variation in chromosome number and ploidy in Brassicaceae and in the genus Physaria. In Chapter 2, we extracted DNA representing 84 species of Physaria species and employed a 2b-RAD sequencing technique to generate data for phylogeny reconstruction. The specific goals of the study were 1) to reconstruct the phylogeny of Physaria and assess whether species relationships proposed in early monographs by Payson (1921) and Rollins and Shaw (1973) based on morphology correspond to the current species relationships revealed through the molecular phylogeny representing 86 species of Physaria, 2) to investigate the monophyly of species represented by multiple accessions in the resulting phylogeny, and 3) to investigate how the inclusion of polyploid taxa affects the topology of the phylogeny, which may help shed light on the origins of polyploid taxa. The resulting phylogeny had species from Mexico and Texas at the base of the tree, suggesting that the genus originated in southern North America, although additional outgroups and a formal biogeographic analysis are needed to confirm this result. The species in the phylogeny were grouped into two main clades, one containing species predominantly from eastern North America, and one containing species predominantly from western North America. Except for the group 1 species proposed by Rollins and Shaw in 1973, none of proposed groups of species in monographs formed clades. Instead, the resulting phylogeny grouped species collected from nearby locations irrespective of their taxonomic placement, suggesting a strong biogeographical affinity towards species groupings, possibly due to hybridization within geographic locations. Only a handful of species were monophyletic; in the eastern clade, P. recurvata, P. gracilis, P. angustifolia, P. globosa, and a new species, P. ouachitensisformed monophyletic species in phylogenies in which the polyploid species were present and absent. In the western clade, P. brassicoides, P. pruinosa, P. valida, P. parvula, P. pulvinata and P. intermedia formed monophyletic species when the polyploids were removed. The topology varied depending on whether polyploids were included, suggesting that some species may be hybrids or allopolyploids. Conducting additional chromosome counts, identifying hybrid and allopolyploid taxa, and reconstructing the evolution of ploidy levels is an important area for future studies to understand how they have affected diversification in the group. Overall, the current study resulted a well resolved phylogeny with many taxa of Physaria, which is useful for future studies on understanding the evolutionary history, character evolution, and biogeography of the genus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis)Same topicPlant Ecology and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207