Red Wings clinch 24th straight playoff spot; Blues win division
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Red Wings clinch playoffs for 24th straight season; Blues win central division. A hockey team clinched a playoff spot for the 24th consecutive year Thursday night, despite losing The Detroit Red Wings lost in overtime to the Montreal Canadiens 4-3, but with that one point earned a playoff berth for the 24th year in a row Afterwards, left winger Henrik Zetterberg was disappointed his team lost, but happy to be in the post season (audio) The win for Montreal is goalie Carey Price's 43rd of the season, which is a team record, and afterwards he complimented his team for his record breaking year (audio) The St Louis Blues beat the Chicago Blackhawks 2-1 to win the central division - The Ottawa Senators blanked the NY Rangers 3-0 as the playoff push for Ottawa continues - The Calgary Flames clinched a playoff berth and eliminated last years champ the LA Kings, 3-1 - The Winnipeg Jets clinched a playoff spot despite going down to the Colorado Avalanche 1-zip - And the Boston Bruins had it's playoff hopes crushed by the Florida Panthers 4-2 The Bruins will need a lot of help to get in ES Rivet
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.056 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".