MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042822988

Public and Patient Involvement with a Descriptive Qualitative Study to Explore Household Medication Safety in People who were Cocooning during Covid-19.

2021· other· en· W7042822988 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTrinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersIrish Research CouncilTrinity College Dublin
KeywordsMisinformationQualitative researchHealth carePublic healthDescriptive researchPatient safetyService (business)Public healthcare
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Household medication safety during a pandemic.
\n• Medication use is the most common healthcare intervention.
\n• During the COVID-19 pandemic, people who are staying at home and
\nreducing contact with other people for long periods of time are at
\npotentially increased risk of medication-related problems.
\n• Disrupted routine healthcare service and medication supply chains
\n• Altered household mobility, wellbeing and support structures
\n• Reluctance to attend healthcare settings
\n• Misinformation about medications
\n• Patient and public involvement representatives identified this as an
\nimportant research area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.486
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.025 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin)Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207