Récits de pratiques en action communautaire – Un regard sur le Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean et la Côte-Nord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'intervention dans les collectivités est fascinante de diversités de moyens et d'applications. Qu'elle s'enchâsse dans une démarche de changement planifié comme on le voit dans les professions du social, ou encore qu'elle se réalise au sein de groupes communautaires ou citoyens, elle ramène toujours au constat de son caractère innovant. \n \nCet ouvrage a été conçu expressément pour témoigner de cette richesse en proposant pas moins de 25 témoignages d'acteurs et actrices qui ont déployé des moyens variés pour répondre à un besoin, un problème ou un évènement dans leur milieu. Groupes populaires, regroupement de citoyens, organisateurs communautaires; ces personnes ont toutes en commun une chose : croire que le futur vaut la peine d'être défendu maintenant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".