MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042859659

The Proper use of emergency ventilation systems can significantly enhance road tunnels fire safety

2007· article· en· W7042859659 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAFERVentilation (architecture)Railway tunnelCurrent (fluid)Fire safetySmokeComputer simulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A research project has been conducted at the National Research Council of Canada to evaluate the effectiveness in a road tunnel of the current emergency ventilation system to control smoke spread in the event of a fire. The research includes both numerical and experimental studies. The numerical study uses the Fire Dynamic Simulator model to investigate smoke ventilation in tunnels. The experimental study is used to validate the numerical model and to provide the necessary initial and boundary conditions.This paper investigates the effect of the meteorological parameters and tunnel slope on the performance of in-place emergency ventilation strategies in a section of a road tunnel. The study recommends methods for improving the performance of the ventilation strategies in order to promote a safer environment in the tunnel section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicFire dynamics and safety researchFrench-language works237,207