MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042862323

Practical Applications of Machine Learning to Underground Rock Engineering

2023· other· en· W7042862323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkRock mass classificationInterpretabilityArtificial neural networkFeature engineeringConvolution (computer science)Process (computing)Rock mechanicsFilter (signal processing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rock mechanics engineers have increasing access to large quantities of data from underground excavations as sensor technologies are developed, data storage becomes cheaper, and computational speed and power improve. Machine learning has emerged as a viable approach to process data for engineering decision making. This research investigates practical applications of machine learning algorithms (MLAs) to underground rock engineering problems using real datasets from a variety of rock mass deformation contexts. It was found that preserving the format of the original input data as much as possible reduces the introduction of bias during digitalization and results in more interpretable MLAs. 
\n
\nA Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is developed using a dataset from Cigar Lake Mine, Saskatchewan, Canada, to predict the tunnel liner yield class. Several hyperparameters are optimized: the amount of training data, the convolution filter size, and the error weighting scheme. Two CNN architectures are proposed to characterize the rock mass deformation: (i) a Global Balanced model that has a prediction accuracy >65% for all yield classes, and (ii) a Targeted Class 2/3 model that emphasizes the worst case yield and has a recall of >99% for Class 2. The interpretability of the CNN is investigated through three Input Variable Selection (IVS) methods. The three methods are Channel Activation Strength, Input Omission, and Partial Correlation. The latter two are novel methods proposed for CNNs using a spatial and temporal geomechanical dataset. Collectively, the IVS analyses indicate that all the available digitized inputs are needed to produce good CNN performances. 
\n
\nA Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) network is developed using a dataset for Garson Mine, near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, to predict the stress state in a FLAC3D model. This is a novel method proposed to semi-automate calibration of finite-difference models of high-stress environments. A workflow for optimizing the hyperparameters of the LSTM network is proposed. The performance of the LSTM network predicting the three principal stresses is improved as compared to predicting the six-component stress tensor, with corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) values of -59.62 and -45.50, respectively. 
\n
\nGeneral recommendations are made with respect to machine learning algorithm development for practical rock engineering problems, in terms of how to format and pre-process inputs, select architectures, tune hyperparameters, and determine engineering verification metrics. Recommendations are made to demonstrate how algorithms can be rendered interpretable with the application of tools that already exist in the field of machine learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)Same topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207