Recording to See, Editing to Notice, Noticing to Learn: Experiencing a Weird Summer Through Experimental Video
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is an account of my experience of living-with a place through Research-Creation and Heuristics. During the summer of 2023 I walked and recorded the city of Montreal, exploring what experimental video could teach me about being in a place and what it might inform my pedagogical thinking and future practice. While recording every day and returning to the archives, I created four experimental videos, six post-edition images from the stills included as In-between sections connecting chapters along the text, and an art website. All these Research-Creation results relate to the experience of feeling a place and climate change. Noticing those sometimes small or big, yet always heavy differences from day to day, mingled with what is expected of a season, concepts of grief of landscape, weirdness and living-with are strongly connected to the findings. This thesis concludes with the conception of a teaching philosophy that reflects on how this research has influenced my art and educational thinking of living in the era of the Pyrocene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".