MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042939253

SEISMIC DESIGN AND BEHAVIOUR OF PRECAST CONCRETE CONNECTIONS FOR ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION

2025· dissertation· en· W7042939253 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concretePierFragilitySeismic analysisComponent (thermodynamics)Bridge (graph theory)Seismic loadingShear wallStructural system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC), which utilizes precast concrete elements, has emerged as a viable alternative to conventional cast-in-place (CIP) methods by reducing construction timelines and enhancing quality control. The success of ABC in seismic regions depends on the performance of precast connections, which is a key focus of this thesis. Precast connections in ABC range from emulative systems, which mimic CIP behaviour, to non-emulative systems, which incorporate controlled rocking for minimized damage. This thesis examines one representative connection from each category: member socket connections (MSC), referred to as MSC piers (emulative), and segmental post-tensioned precast concrete (SPPC) piers (non-emulative). These two systems have different levels of existing knowledge. For SPPC piers, this thesis focuses on defining engineering demand parameter (EDP) drift ratio limits through genetic programming (GP)-based predictive equations, establishing the onset of four damage states. A two-tier performance-based seismic design (PBSD) framework is subsequently developed by integrating displacement-based design and fragility analysis to ensure seismic performance objectives are achieved at both the component and system levels. The framework’s effectiveness is validated through a comparative case study of SPPC piers and conventional CIP piers. For MSC piers, the experimental program was divided into two sets of tests—one at the connection level and another at the pier component level—each targeting a distinct damage mechanism within the MSCs that connects precast columns to spread footings. Test data from connection-level side shear load tests informed the development and validation of a finite-element model that accurately simulates capacity and damage modes under direct shear loading. Meanwhile, quasi-static cyclic tests at the pier component level demonstrated the effectiveness of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) in mitigating diagonal shear damage from prying action, permitting shorter embedment lengths while maintaining connection integrity. Overall, the work presented in this thesis advances the seismic design of precast concrete bridges by providing quantitative EDP limits, a systematic PBSD framework, and experimental validation of precast concrete connections under seismic loading. These outcomes support the broader implementation of ABC in Canada for modern bridge infrastructure in seismic regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207