MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042950281

Self-organization, linkages and drivers of change : strategies for development in Nuevo San Juan, Mexico

2007· dissertation· en· W7042950281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity and Sustainable Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsResource management (computing)AppropriationParticipatory rural appraisalCitizen journalismForest managementManagement systemNatural resource managementField (mathematics)Resource (disambiguation)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis analyzes the characteristics of community-based management systems to promote both environmental conservation and rural development.in particular, community structures for self-organization and adaptation, and their evolution in relation to changing community perspectives and policy trends.The community-based forest management system of Nuevo San Juan, Michoacn, Mexico, which is more than two decades old, is the central case study.Through the exploration of structures of self-organization, and the identification and analysis of cross-scale linkages and drivers of change, I explore the case in some depth and provide details on the beginning, management trends and evolution of the communal appropriation of resources.During a period of close to three months, using methods inspired by Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), field data were gathered through approximately one hundred field interviews with community members and others linked to the case.San Juan's intrcate management system includes the exploitation of timber and non{imber forest products through a communal enterprise.Community members of San Juan came together to create a communal management system to solve their local socio-economic problems.The community, unlike many others in Michoacn and Mexico, has been able to maintain the forest resource base and contribute to the generation of employment and socio-economic development in the municipality.New leadership trends and exogenous factors, however, are modfying management processes and previously established trends.The findings indicate that enabling federal legislation, together with leadership and social capacity, can and do contribute to communty self-organization.Moreover, linkages at various levels help to strengthen and consolidate community-based management systems and increase their capacity for adaptation to deal wth pressure from external drivers.ln addtion, the findings suggest that a high level of system resilience, clear institutional and organizational structu[es, and proper government recognition and legal jurisdiction are not sufficient conditions for a successful communal management system.Other conditions, such as the application of core cultural and other values at the individual, community and institutional levels are also necessary to maintain community well- being and cohesion.recognition to all of them I would like to say:Thanks to all the members of the community of Nuevo San Juan that welcomed me to the community and to all the ones that shared tme and information for the development of ths work.lndeed, wthout their participation and generosity the development of this thess document would have been impossble.Moreover, their contributions have greatly contributed to increasing my understanding and attracton towards community-inspired approaches for development.My special thanks go to the elders and founders of the enterprse for their trust, friendship and generosity, to the workers of the community enterprise who provded key support and information and to the other community members that made my stay in Nuevo San Juan a very pleasant one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it