MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042963636

Restructured Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems - A02.1-Y-2-S

2004· article· en· W7042963636 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Space and Astronautical ScienceNuclear PhysicsJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCanadian Space AgencyIndian Space Research OrganisationU.S. Geological SurveyNational Space OrganizationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationKorea Aerospace Research InstituteEuropean Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological SatellitesEuropean Space AgencyAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DiafiltrationDysgeusiaLiquationTriacetinEmperipolesisHyporeflexia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Restructured Organization and Processes document was initially created in response to calls to update and re-engineer the CCSDS organization at its autumn 2002 meeting. As a result, "CCSDS RECORD A02.1-Y-1, PROPOSAL FOR RESTRUCTURING THE CCSDS ORGANIZATION AND PROCESSES" was published in March 2003. This document updates A02.1-Y-1 by removing the rationale that led to the reorganization (thus streamlining the new CCSDS working procedures), and also to clarify the differences between "Recommended Standard" and "Recommended Practice" on the Standards track.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.116
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.176
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1160.176
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.007
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0260.009
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0140.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research)Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207