MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7043001485

The role of race and place in drug use and mortality in the United States

2021· dissertation· en· W7043001485 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaRace (biology)National Health Interview SurveyPrescription drugPopulationMortality rateAmerican Community SurveyDisease controlEthnic groupMedical prescription
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Much of the research on the emergence and recent trends in the opioid epidemic in the United States examines differences by either race or place.Yet, the few studies which assess the intersection of these dimensions reveal unexpected findings, which challenge initial assumptions about the uniformity of the epidemic's impact.As such, this thesis aims to better describe differences in trends of drug overdose mortality and drug-use outcomes for non-Hispanic Blacks and Whites across three metropolitan categories: large metro, small metro, and nonmetro.Objectives: This thesis aims to 1) present trends in all-drug and opioid-related mortality rates between 2003-2018; 2) highlight differences in changes in drug-related mortality before and after the peak of the epidemic in 2015; 3) delineate time trends in illicit drug use and prescription pain reliever misuse between 2003-2018; and 4) describe recent patterns in access to and source of drugs, for Blacks and Whites based on their metropolitan status.Methods: Drug mortality data was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER database for national and population level data.Drug use data was obtained from the National Survey for Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a nationally representative annual survey.Results: For Blacks, drug-related mortality rates between 2003 to 2018 were consistently higher in large and small metro areas than in non-metro areas; such disparities by metro status did not emerge among Whites until 2011.In 2018, opioid-related deaths continued to rise for Blacks in large and small metro areas, but declined for Blacks in nonmetro areas, and for Whites in all metro categories.In contrast to drug-related mortality trends, self-reported drug use trends did not vary greatly between 2003-2018.Despite similar mortality rates prior to 2011, metro-based differences in illicit drug use and prescription pain reliever misuse among Whites were apparent over the entire time period.Among Blacks, illicit drug use was always higher in large and small metro areas; however, there were no metro-based differences in trends in prescription pain reliever misuse.Although reported drug use rates are generally lower, Blacks in all metro categories were more likely than Whites to report being approached by someone selling drugs, and this likelihood was highest among Blacks in large and small metro areas. Conclusions:The findings demonstrate that many of the common narratives in drug use and mortality trends cannot be applied across racial and metropolitan groups.In contrast to common narratives, in recent years the opioid drug overdose epidemic is worsening for Blacks in both large and small metro areas, while it is declining for Whites.Thus, recent intervention efforts may be overlooking a particularly vulnerable subpopulation.Moreover, efforts to address drug use and its outcomes among Blacks should not be limited to large-urban areas, as patterns of drug use and mortality between small and large urban areas are consistently similar.Among rural Blacks, drug-related mortality and illicit drug use were consistently lowest, in spite of heightened risks for drug use for this population.The persistence of this trend is significant and not explained by just barriers in access to prescription opioids.Empirical research is needed to better understand why rates are escalating among more urban Blacks, while remaining low for rural Blacks and declining for Whites in all metro categories.Overall, studying drug-related mortality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→