← Back to cohort
Search for a light charged Higgs boson in t → H<SUP>±</SUP>b decays, with H<SUP>±</SUP> → cb, in the lepton plus jets final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector
Bibliographic record
VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsUniversitetet i OsloUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRoyal Holloway, University of LondonUniversidade Federal de São João del-ReiAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloSorbonne UniversitéCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityShanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and CosmologyUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaState Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and ElectronicsUniversität InnsbruckUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaUniversidade do MinhoAkademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa StaszicaCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueUniverza v LjubljaniUniversidad de TarapacáConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoUniverzita Palackého v OlomouciUniversité Paris-SaclayHigh Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationUniversidade de LisboaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesUniversité de GenèveUnited Arab Emirates UniversityIsrael Science FoundationDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonUniversiteit van AmsterdamUniversité de FribourgJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversidade de CoimbraUniversidade de São PauloScottish Universities Physics AllianceNational Tsing Hua UniversityCERNMinistry of Education, IndiaShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityUniversità degli Studi di PaviaMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyUniversità di PisaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasSapienza Università di RomaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftAkademie Věd České RepublikyBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftAix-Marseille UniversitéOhio State UniversityČeské Vysoké Učení Technické v PrazeNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloAbdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsUniversität HeidelbergAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaJustus Liebig Universität GießenUniversity of OxfordDanmarks GrundforskningsfondAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgUniversity College LondonUniversity of PennsylvaniaAustrian Science FundUniversity of GlasgowYork UniversityLouisiana Tech UniversityLunds UniversitetUniversité Grenoble AlpesNew York University Abu DhabiNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyUniversity of OregonInstituto Superior TécnicoBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungUniversidad de GranadaUniversity of PittsburghIowa State UniversityPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileUniversità degli Studi di TrentoUniversidad Nacional de La PlataMichigan State UniversityShandong UniversityUniversidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenUniverzita Karlova v PrazeMcGill UniversityHarvard UniversityQueen Mary University of LondonUniversity of OklahomaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINorthern Illinois UniversityRadboud UniversiteitFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversity of WashingtonLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekInstitut "Jožef Stefan"Oklahoma State University
KeywordsHiggs bosonLarge Hadron ColliderTop quarkMuonAtlas (anatomy)LeptonBosonBranching fractionATLAS experiment
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno