MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043174410

« Resāle dar bayān-e čahār dastgāh-e aʽẓam ». Faṣl-nāme-ye mūsīqī-ye Māhūr, n° 12, (été 2001), pp. 81-92. [Traité sur quatre grands dastgāh]

2010· review· fr· W7043174410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2010
Typereview
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParaphernaliaQuarter (Canadian coin)Auteur theory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C’est le texte édité d’un traité de musique sans date et d’un auteur anonyme appartenant au recueil de manuscrits numéro 3536 de la bibliothèque Malek. L’éditeur présente, dans son introduction, une classification des traités de musique de l’époque safavide qui ont subsisté jusqu’aujourd’hui et en mentionne les particularités. Selon lui, la dernière partie de cet ouvrage sur les quatre dastgāh est un traité indépendant rédigé probablement en 19e s. L’ouvrage aborde, dans ses différentes part...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207