Soul-winning: a course of four lectures delivered under the auspices of the theological union of Victoria university, Cobourg.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
fourthly, a Divinely authenticated and plenarily inspired Bible,-a Bible, the authority of which is ulti- mate and infallible.Our standard as preachers is not a subjective one : what we think ought to be, but objective, what the Bible says is. 5.It implies, still further, the Presence and Poiver of the Holy Spirit,as the promise of the Father, the gift of the Son, and the only efficient agent of a living and successful min- istry.In the absence of these primal truths, the functions of the ministry, as we understand it, have no existence.By what, then, ought the work of the Student to be marked ?And I hope that in dealing with this topic, in this presence, to be saved from presumption.1.I may safely say, however, that the mental culture of the student ought to be broad,-it ought to be manysided.An educated Canada claims this of her present day preachers.The days of Jack Cade are happily gone.English historians tell us that in the reign of the 6thHenry, an insurrection took place, one object of which was to dethrone the king ; the other, to put an effectual stop to all such heresy as paper manufacturing, type founding, printing, and learning !One poor man was pounced upon by the rebels while in the act of setting a few boys their copies, with the laudable intention of teaching them to write, and without further provoca- tion he was hanged upon the nearest tree, with his pen and inkhorn about his neck, as a villain, a traitor, and a conjuror !Another individual, a nobleman, was beheaded, because he had taken a similar interest in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.067 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".