Sensory and microbial changes in retail-displayed fresh pork previously stored under controlled (CO|2) atmospheres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research for this Masters thesis was divided into two parts. The first part was concerned with the evaluation of a refrigerated container previously designed to store fresh pork chops at -1.5C under 100% CO2. To assess the ability of the container to delay spoilage, measurements of metmyoglobin content, sensory changes and microbial populations of the pork chops were conducted. Tests were conducted on chops after a period of storage (weeks) in the container followed by aerobic display at 4C for up to 4 days. It was determined that fresh pork chops could be stored for up 9 weeks with 4 days of subsequent retail display with minimal changes in appearance, odour, and palatability. The second half of the work concerned the development of a selective medium for the isolation of carnobacteria. The aim of this study was to improve CTAS agar by broadening the spectrum of 'Carnobacterium' spp. recovery and increasing specificity through systematic improvement. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".