MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7043363584

Juist beschermd

2022· other· nl· W7043363584 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2022
Typeother
Languagenl
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Quarter (Canadian coin)Scheme (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Veel instellingen in de verstandelijk-gehandicaptensector hebben in de laatste jaren hun zorgaanbod vernieuwd. Bij deze vernieuwingen gaat het vaak om verzorgd wonen, dat wil zeggen wonen met 24-uurszorg dat kleinschaliger ingevuld wordt. Uit een eerdere SCP-studie (Zorg voor verstandelijke gehandicapten, 2005) blijkt dat van de 60.000 zorgintensieve cliënten in de verstandelijk-gehandicaptenzorg de helft verzorgd woont en de andere helft niet. In een vervolg op deze studie wordt in Juist beschermd uitgezocht of er aanwijsbare factoren zijn die ervoor zorgen dat de ene cliënt verzorgd woont en de andere cliënt, met een vergelijkbare handicap, (begeleid) zelfstandig of bij de ouders woont.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0150.009
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2760.103

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)→French-language works237,207→