Singing memory (oral transmission of knowledge and access rights among the Shuswap (British Columbia, Canada))
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse cherche à définir la fonction du chant dans un système nord-amérindien de transmission orale des savoirs, et cela à l exemple des Shuswap, qui attribuent une grande importance à leur propriété intellectuelle . La thèse est divisée en 4 sections. Section 1 comporte une introduction ethnographique générale au travail (l aire culturelle du Plateau et son histoire, ensuite les Secwepemc plus précisément) et présente le concept de la thèse, fondée sur une méthode de travail combinant une longue recherche sur le terrain et l étude des sources écrites. Section 2 confronte les études éthno-musicologiques existantes sur le Plateau avec la manière secwepemc. Section 3 présente quelques aspects de la manière secwepemc de concevoir le monde intégral , ainsi que les trois systèmes de classification du répertoire (utilisation, origine, droits d accès). Section 4 comporte l analyse de la place du chant face à d autres voies de transmission orale (cérémonies, rituels, mythes et histoires), et la tentative d approcher de manière holistique cette culture à partir de sa conception du chant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".