MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7043604984

Therapists in training: Brief interventions to ease negative self-evaluations and improve affective well-being

2023· other· en· W7043604984 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionDysfunctional familyDistressMental healthIntervention (counseling)EmpathyPsychological distressHealth psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical and counselling psychology trainees take on many different roles throughout the course of their graduate training, including intensive course loads, research, and clinical training. Previous research has identified significant distress and psychological symptoms reported by graduate students in clinical training. Also documented are complex barriers to receiving help for their mental health concerns. The aim of the current study was to better understand the experiences of graduate therapist trainees by tracking them over time to investigate the psychological difficulties they experience, and to examine the efficacy of brief online exercises designed to combat self-criticism and induce self-compassion. 254 clinical and counselling psychology trainees were recruited from 50 graduate programs across Canada and the United States. Participants completed baseline measures assessing self-compassion, self-criticism, positive, negative, and compassionate affect, depression, anxiety, dysfunctional attitudes, fear of negative evaluation, stress, and professional self-doubt. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups, a “working with self-criticism” condition, a “loving kindness meditation” condition, or a waitlist control condition. Following the baseline measures, trainees completed the online interventions for eight weeks, then completed measures at post-test and a one-month follow-up. Results indicated that the therapist trainees experienced moderate to severe levels of distress on most psychological outcome measures at baseline. However, it was found that the two active conditions were effective in reducing self-criticism and fear of negative evaluation, while increasing compassionate affect compared to the control condition. The results support the value of self-care and reflective practices among clinical and counselling trainees. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→French-language works237,207→