MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043605897

The Ultraviolet Radiation Environment and Use of Observable Sun Protection at Secondary School Rowing Regattas

2021· dissertation· en· W7043605897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOtago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSun protectionSunburnRowingUltraviolet radiationSkin cancerSun exposureClothingDaylight
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background \nSkin cancer is the most common cancer in New Zealand/Aotearoa and the incidence of melanoma, the most serious form of skin cancer, is amongst the highest in the world. Overexposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) causes over 90% of all skin cancers. It is also implicated in eye health issues, such as cataract and pterygium. Teenagers have been identified as an at-risk group for sun exposure because they experience higher levels of sunburn and have lower uptake of sun protection measures compared with other age groups. Secondary school sports participation has many associated benefits, but some outdoor summer sport settings have a high UVR exposure profile. There is little evidence that sun protection policies and guidelines are currently embedded at secondary school level or are adopted by summer sports organisations. Sun protection usually remains the responsibility of the competitor. This thesis relates to the secondary school sport of competitive rowing. It considers both the UVR environment within which secondary school rowers compete and the current use of visible sun protection by participants during competition. \n\nMethods \nThe empirical contribution in this thesis is organised into two parts. The first measures personal UVR exposure using dosimeters positioned on the shoulder of rowers at six regattas held during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 Austral summer seasons. Second, a database of photographs of rowing crews at the race start line afforded comprehensive insights into the use of visible sun protective headwear, sunglasses and clothing by competitors. \n\nResults \nDosimeter measurements included standard erythemal dose (where 1 SED equals 100 joules per m2), SED per hour and percentage ambient UVR. Over two-thirds (67.2%) of individual race-times, which is defined as the total time on the water in order to compete in a rowing race recorded a SED in excess of the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency recommendation of 1 SED per day. In addition, 24.1% of race-times equalled or exceeded 1.5 SED, which is the UVR dose estimated to cause just perceivable sunburn in individuals with light coloured skin. The median SED per hour for the five rowing regattas held at Lake Ruataniwha ranged from 0.97-2.37 SED per hour and the median percentage ambient ranged from 17–35%. \nThe photographic analysis indicated an established culture of cap wearing amongst rowers. In addition, approximately one-third of competitors wore sunglasses. However, one-fifth of competitors wore no headwear or eye protection and younger age groups were observed using the least visible sun protection. Females demonstrated a propensity to wear visors that offer even less sun protection than caps during competition. The use of protective clothing under the rowing zootie was almost non-existent. However, coxswains were well protected with headwear, sunglasses and clothing. \n\nConclusions \nApplying these findings to the Ottawa Charter conceptual framework for health promotion highlights the need for a multifaceted approach if improvements in the use of sun protection by secondary school rowing students is to be achieved. The documented UVR exposure and concurrent information about visible sun protection use provides the opportunity for targeted sun protection strategies to be implemented in the sport of rowing. Targeting the most junior rowers with interventions to improve use of headwear and sunglasses would be a suitable starting point, but leadership from the national rowing body will be required to lift the 20% of rowers who currently do not use any form of headwear or sunglasses to routine adoption of sun protection for racing. Implementing best practice guidelines, including phasing out the use of visors and encouraging the use of sleeved tops to the start line, will improve not only the short- term health of secondary student rowers but should also reduce the long-term risks from overexposure to UVR. The recommendations arising from this research do not extend to the use of sunscreen. Best practice guidelines would, however, need to cover all five sun protection measures which, in addition to the ones studied here, include sunscreen use when competing and use of shade between races. Rowing is a unique and rewarding sport and secondary students should be able to receive the benefits associated with participation without the harms associated with overexposure to the Sun. \nLike most summer outdoor sports in Aotearoa, Rowing New Zealand does not currently have a sun protection policy. The development of such a policy that aims to establish habitual sun protection practices on the part of all participants appears to be a necessary response to the personal UVR exposure doses reported in this thesis. Only then will the long-term wellbeing of all secondary school student rowers in relation to overexposure to UVR be realised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOtago University Research Archive (University of Otago)Same topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207