Television Programming for Children : A Content Analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coordinamento progetto di ricerca internazionale : Television Programming for Children : A Content Analysis. La ricerca é condotta in collaborazione con il Centre of Youth and Media Studies (Department of Communication. University of Montreal. Cofinanziamento Alliance for Children and Television – CANADA)) ed é parte di un piu ampio progetto comparativo internazionale direto da Maya Goetz (IZI, Munchen, Germany). Il progetto prevede un’analisi comparativa del contenuto della programmazione televisiva per bambini e ragazzi, in onda nei paesi che partecipano al progetto allo scopo di monitorare le caratteristiche dell’offerta televisiva nei vari paesi (generi, paesi di produzione dei programmi) fare emergere il tasso di internazionalizzazione vs. localizzazione dei prodotti e comparare alcune variabili di contenuto considerate particolarmente rilevanti (stereotipi di genere, caratteristiche dei personaggi, temi ricorrenti, rapresentazione dei cnfliti, etc..).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".