Tarifa-Tánger en la Ruta de la redención de cautivos, 1624 -1625
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the last quarter of the sixteenth century, the Spanish Crown intervened directly \nin the redemption of captives made by the Orders of the Most Holy Trinity and Our \nLady of Mercy - to whom confirmed the monopoly of these missions- and controlled \nthrough a notary appointed by the Consejo de Castilla who recorded all the movements \nand transactions made by the redeemers. The acts of redemption are a primary \nsource for local history of the places were redemption took place because they include \nnotes of prices, distances, journeys, officials and local notaries, among other things \nas well as on the incidence of captivity and attacks by Barbary pirates over Spanish \ncoastal towns. Tarifa was not a usual stopover in the route of redemptions, but in the \nyears 1624-1625 it was the boarding point the Mercedarians used in their round trip \nfrom Tangier, a city where exceptionally captives rescues were made those years instead \nof the usual Gibraltar-Tetouan route: this thing would probably be related to the \ninterests of the Crown around Corsair enclave of Salé and the safety of navigation and \nthe Atlantic coasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".