MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043720262

Summary of the Presentation at Southern Methodist University (SMU) November 8, 1997: Judicial Reform in the Americas

2017· article· en· W7043720262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansInjusticeDemocracyPresentation (obstetrics)World War IICold warDeveloping country
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last few years have witnessed the beginning of a reinforcement of democratic processes and institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean and, at the same time, a gradual but nevertheless strong transformation of state-run economies toward private enterprise and ownership and toward systems oriented to the market.On the other hand, the two richest and most industrialized countries of the Western Hemisphere, the United States and Canada, have changed their often contradictory policies and priorities, developed during the years of World War II and the cold war, and have begun to look to other aspects of their relationships with their southern neighbors, in which the protection of American and Canadian interests in the region is not the paramount objective of their economic policy, but a more comprehensive and long-term agenda looking for: the expansion of markets; the increase of the flow of trade, in both directions; the growth of private enterprise, both large and small, both national and foreign; the reduction of poverty; and the suppression of inequalities and injustice as a way of fighting terrorism, drug trafficking, and corruption, and as a long term road to strong and lasting democracies and growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0110.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)Same topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207