MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043720262

Summary of the Presentation at Southern Methodist University (SMU) November 8, 1997: Judicial Reform in the Americas

2017· article· en· W7043720262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansInjusticeDemocracyPresentation (obstetrics)World War IICold warDeveloping country
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The last few years have witnessed the beginning of a reinforcement of democratic processes and institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean and, at the same time, a gradual but nevertheless strong transformation of state-run economies toward private enterprise and ownership and toward systems oriented to the market.On the other hand, the two richest and most industrialized countries of the Western Hemisphere, the United States and Canada, have changed their often contradictory policies and priorities, developed during the years of World War II and the cold war, and have begun to look to other aspects of their relationships with their southern neighbors, in which the protection of American and Canadian interests in the region is not the paramount objective of their economic policy, but a more comprehensive and long-term agenda looking for: the expansion of markets; the increase of the flow of trade, in both directions; the growth of private enterprise, both large and small, both national and foreign; the reduction of poverty; and the suppression of inequalities and injustice as a way of fighting terrorism, drug trafficking, and corruption, and as a long term road to strong and lasting democracies and growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)Same topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207