Ulomci oslikane žbuke prvog stila s područja rimskih hramova u\nNezakciju iz arheoloških istraživanja 1978. i 1980./81.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U ovom se članku obrađuju ulomci oslikane žbuke s karakteristikama prvog stila, koji su u najvećem broju pronađeni u srednjoj prostoriji sjevernog hrama (C) smještenog na rimskom kapitoliju u Nezakciju.Lokalitet je udaljen od Pule oko 12 km.Očuvani dekor pripadao je zidnoj površini i uglavnom se radi o jednobojnim žutim, ružičastim i tamnocrvenim ulomcima, dijelovima bunja ili ortostata.Imitacija mramora je malobrojna, ali značajna, jer ukazuje na raznovrsnost u načinu dekoracije.Budući da su ulomci pronađeni u sekundarnom položaju te nisu međusobno povezani, nije moguće rekonstruirati dekorativne sisteme.Također, postoje teškoće u povezivanju oslikane žbuke s izvornom građevinom i prostorima kojima su pripadali.Unatoč brojnim nepoznanicama, prikazani ulomci predstavljaju značajan primjer upotrebe prvog stila u kasnijem razdoblju, ne samo na području hrvatske Istre već i u X. regiji Venetia et Histria kojoj Nezakcij pripada. KLJUČNE RIJEČI: Nezakcij;
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".