Učinci Sjevernoameričkog sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini za Kanadu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U ovom diplomskom radu proučavaju se učinci Sjevernoameričkog sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini (Northern American Free Trade Agreement) za Kanadu. Ovaj trgovinski sporazum sklopljen je 1994. godine između SAD-a, Meksika i Kanade u svrhu postizanja konkurentnosti područja slobodne trgovine. Glavni cilj rada je prikazati konačne učinke liberalizacije trgovine na gospodarstvo Kanade u smislu utjecaja na poljoprivredu i investiranje te na kanadsku socijalnu politiku u vidu rada, odnosno zapošljavanja i migracija. Također, u radu su obuhvaćeni i teorijski stavovi o liberalizaciji trgovine kao i konceptu međuovisnosti država. Osim toga, na kraju rada je preispitana perspektiva NAFTA-e kao i ono što donosi nasljednik NAFTA trgovinskog sporazuma USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement).\n U svrhu postizanja boljeg uvida u učinke Sjevernoameričkog sporazuma o slobodnoj trgovini za Kanadu, istraživanje je provedeno na temelju iščitavanja relevantne domaće i strane stručne literature, pri čemu su neki podaci u radu prikazani i statističkim metodama.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".