Tabloïdisation et crise paradigmatique du journalisme : le changement de format du quotidien Le Soleil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La crise que traverse la presse écrite provoque moult questionnements sur le sort qui lui est réservé. Afin d'affronter leurs difficultés structurelles et économiques, les entreprises de presse usent de différentes stratégies. Parmi celles-ci, le changement de format en est une populaire qui aurait une influence sur le journalisme et les pratiques qui y sont associées. Par le recours à une théorie évolutive des changements paradigmatiques du journalisme ainsi que par l'utilisation des concepts d'hyperconcurrence et de tabloïdisation, nous avons effectué une étude de cas du quotidien Le Soleil de Québec qui a adopté le format compact en 2006. Grâce à une triangulation de méthodes qualitatives permettant l'examen de deux ordres discursifs différents, soit le métadiscours et le discours journalistique, le présent mémoire apporte un éclairage empirique sur cet aspect particulier du journalisme contemporain, dont émergerait un type de tabloïd nouveau genre conjuguant anciennes et nouvelles normes journalistiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".