MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043820837

Unapređenje upotrebljivosti otvorenih podataka definisanjem metode kategorizacije zasnovane na metapodacima portala otvorenih podataka

2023· dissertation· en· W7043820837 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Repository of Dissertations in Serbia · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicE-Government and Public Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataCategorizationLinked dataUsabilityData elementTransparency (behavior)Open data
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to numerous data transparency and open government initiatives, a large volume of data was published on open data portals. To make it more accessible and visible, these portals have introduced data filtering by category, tags, format, organization, etc. This information is stored as metadata and provided when publishing the data. However, the metadata is not always complete. The lack of data categories has a great impact on the data visibility, accessibility, and usability of information. As the data increases on the portals, it becomes harder to find and identify the wanted information when the category is missing. Within this doctoral dissertation, an analysis of metadata on open data portals, as well as an analysis of categories and tags usage, and their connections on open data portals was performed. Afterward, the problem of missing data categories was addressed by proposing a methodology for data categorization based on the combination of tags. Within the methodology, the hierarchical organization of tags in a category was defined based on their usage in categorized data. Then, a tool was presented for visual analysis of the hierarchical organization of tags, and a proposal was given for the data categorization based on the combination of tags. The presented categorization relies on the way tags are used in categorized data, i.e. their hierarchical organization. The approach calculates the similarity between two tags, and two combinations of tags, as well as defines the parameters for categorizing the combination of tags with categories on the portal. Afterward, an algorithm was defined that proposes the categories for a dataset with a given combination of tags. For the proposed categorization, an evaluation was performed using the data from the Canadian open data portal. Lastly, within the doctoral dissertation, a model was proposed for supplementing the datasets’ metadata on open data portals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0170.016
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Repository of Dissertations in SerbiaSame topicE-Government and Public ServicesFrench-language works237,207