TROTTOIR BARRÉ: Investigating Montreal construction policy and its implications for the pedestrian realm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Ce projet de recherche supervisé tente d’évaluer l’impact des pratiques de construction actuelles sur le domaine piétonnier et de comparer ces impacts à une nouvelle politique municipale visant à améliorer les conditions des piétons sur les sites de construction. Les pratiques de construction actuelles sont vérifiées sur la base des qualités du design urbain actuel et des théories sous-jacentes de l’espace public. Un vocabulaire conceptuel est établi pour évaluer à la fois les sites de construction physiques et le paysage politique dans lequel ils s’inscrivent. Cette recherche est entreprise dans la ville de Montréal, où une nouvelle politique a été adoptée pour protéger la mobilité des piétons et des cyclistes sur les chantiers de construction. La politique est analysée comparativement à des politiques similaires d’autres municipalités afin de déterminer la capacité de la politique de Montréal à créer un changement positif."@fre
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".