Wall paintings from Tharros (Sardinia, Italy): new trials for a 3D reconstruction of the Punic-Roman living Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fragments of wall paintings found in the Punic-Roman site of Tharros (Oristano, Italy) are extremely rare. Considering the survived evidences, the more relevant fragments in situ are placed in the buildings nn. 20 and 58, located in the western residential quarter and in the adjacent area to “Semitic Temple”, respectively. Based on the conservation status of the pieces, the evidences in the building n. 20 are probably attributable to late IInd-IIIrd styles of Pompeian wall painting, documenting a probable occupation at least until the Ist century B.C.- Ist century A.D. The re-reading of excavation diaries written by Gennaro Pesce between 1956 and 1964 has been useful to reconstruct the distribution of the wall paintings in the site, found often as fragments in the ground. Considering the exceptional character of the evidences in the site of Tharros, it has been carried out a relief by laser scanner involving the two better preserved fragments: this represents the basis for the archaeological reconstruction of the decorative items and a trial in view of virtual reconstruction aimed at exploiting the archaeological area as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".