Turkish version of the McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire Form (MPQF) [McGill Melzack Aǧri Soru Formu'nun (MASF) türkçe'ye uyarlanmasi]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Mc Gill Melzack Pain Questionnaire Form (MPQF) for the population in Turkey. In the first stage, the instrument was translated into Turkish. In the second stage, a specialist was translated the instrument back into English. After the review of consultants, the final form of the scale was applied to 98 postoperative patients. The data collected from this sample was used in the evaluation of the reliability and validity of the form. To test these characteristics item-total score correlation, cronbach alpha coefficient and rotation of the factor matrix were used. The accounted reliability of coefficiency with cronbach alpha was found 0.98 for the research population. The item reliability coefficients of the form parts were between 0.52 and 0.72 for the second part, 0.50 and 0.70 for the third part, 0.50 and 0.58 for the fourth part.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".