MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043902819

Understanding the attitudinal and behavioural impact or organisational redundancy : a case study of employees in the UK manufacturing company

2009· other· en· W7043902819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)WorkforcePhenomenonQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While modern organisations constantly undertake different forms of organisational change, redundancy often appears as an inevitable consequence. In the UK, the redundancy rate has been relatively constant since 1995 and there was a rise during the final quarter of 2002, according to National Statistics Report (2006). Since redundancy has been widely utilised in the modem business practice, the outcomes of redundancy episode have been evaluated through different perspectives as discussed within the literature. Measuring the attitudes and behaviour of employees throughout a redundancy exercise can indicate the effects of such a phenomenon to the workforce and pinpoint specific trends. This helps to understand how the remaining employees (survivors) are affected and how this may impact the organisation, when most businesses will agree that people are a crucial element for the organisation. This thesis, therefore, intends to explore the issues that emerged after a redundancy had taken place from the attitudinal and behavioural aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207