MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043927989

Ten geleide: de historische eindscriptie historisch bekeken

2023· article· nl· W7043927989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLeiden Repository (Leiden University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Continuing educationFirst world war
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>De bachelor- en masterscriptie die nu het sluitstuk vormen van de geschiedenisstudie, zijn in hun vorm de afgeleiden van het proefschrift. De wortels daarvan gaan terug tot in de Middeleeuwen. Hetzelfde geldt voor de praktijk van de verdediging ervan in de vorm van een publieke gedachtewisseling of discussie. Bij de massificatie van het onderwijs in de twintigste eeuw ontstond de behoefte om de meerderheid van de studenten met een bul te laten vertrekken zonder kostbaar en langdurig promotietraject. Daartoe werd een miniproefschrift in het leven geroepen, waaraan in wezen dezelfde eisen worden gesteld als aan zijn grote en veel oudere broer. Het is een ideale examenvorm, die toetst of de student in staat is tot zelfstandig onderzoek en een oorspronkelijke bijdrage aan het wetenschappelijk debat.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeiden Repository (Leiden University)Same topicEducator Training and Historical PedagogyFrench-language works237,207