MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043965473

Unlearning The Basics: _A New Way of Understanding Yourself and the World_

2010· book· en· W7043965473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplicationGautama BuddhaBuddhismConversationReading (process)PleaExposition (narrative)Agency (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLEARNING THE BASICS is a non-sectarian philosophical introduction to Buddhist thought and practice. The fundamentals of Buddhadharma are explored in their original contexts and in conversation with both psychoanalytic developmental theory and existential-phenomenological thought on finitude and ‘authentic’ ways of living. That being said, this is not a book ‘for scholar’s only’. Its writing is accessible to any educated persons with an interest in the subject. ⮕ MU SOENG (review) “An exciting read. Sativihari's book is in many ways a model for how the teachings of the Buddha could and should be talked about in a psychologically mature and sophisticated environment and offers his own innovative insights into what the Buddha was trying to convey in his explication of the four noble truths. This is an important book and I hope it gets the wide audience it deserves. It adds much to the current discourses and also brings us much closer to a more nuanced understanding of the Buddha's own thought processes.” — Mu Soeng Scholar in Residence, Barre Centre for Buddhist Studies Author of “Trust in Mind: The Rebellion of Chinese Zen” ⮕ MARK KINGWELL (review) "An exhilarating and lucid introduction to Buddhist thought. Sativihari begins with a sophisticated reading of the Four Noble Truths as a sacred poem and ends with a plea for more compassionate culture and politics. In between there is wisdom spiked on every page.” — Mark Kingwell Professor of Philosophy, University of Toronto Author of “The World We Want“ ⮕ GILLES MONGEAU (review) “As a practitioner trained in Christian forms of meditation, I am deeply grateful for Rishi Sativihari's achievement in ‘Unlearning The Basics.’ His translation of Buddhist wisdom into Western language and images is practical and concrete. Often, attempts to help Westerners understand Buddhism rely too heavily on idealist philosophies, leading to a kind of mystification of the four noble truths. Because Dr. Sativihari appeals consistently to experience and is sophisticated in his understanding of Western philosophy and theology, he can present the four noble truths with profound spiritual realism. The work is very reader-friendly, showing the fruits of extensive reflection on pedagogical practice. There is genuine spiritual maturity at work in this text.” — Gilles Mongeau, S.J. Professor of Theology, University of Toronto, Regis College Author of ‘Embracing Wisdom: The Summa theologiae as Spiritual Pedagogy”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)Same topicX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyFrench-language works237,207