MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044004457

Vigilantism in Minnesota, 1850-1920

2021· dissertation· en· W7044004457 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)NewspaperState (computer science)IndigenousEconomic JusticeIdeologyLaw enforcement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vigilantism, to Americans today, is often associated with white supremacist terrorism perpetrated to uphold Jim Crow or with the mythologized gunfighter of the Wild West, entrusted with upholding the law when the state was unable to do so. In Minnesota, however, the arrival of vigilantism in the late 1850s postdated the establishment of courts, secure prisons, and professional law enforcement and it continued, largely unpunished, into the early 1920s. Furthermore, the victims of Minnesotan vigilantism were overwhelmingly white and Indigenous rather than Black. Through an examination of newspaper records, this paper investigates why the demographics of Minnesotan lynching victims were different than in other states and for what reason vigilantism continued to be practiced in the state for so long after a working criminal justice system was established. In this paper I argue that vigilantism went unpunished because it did not threaten the white settler-colonial state, but rather it reinforced the patriarchal, white supremacist ideology which underpinned it. Vigilantes typically were white men who took it upon themselves to regulate the sexual and domestic lives of their communities, punishing extramarital sex, interracial sex, and spousal neglect which often were not crimes in the eyes of the law. In the 1850s to 1870s, white mobs disproportionately targeted Indigenous victims for lynching, with the newspaper record suggesting that white settlers were concerned they would be treated with too much leniency by the court system. In the first two decades of the 20th century, white Minnesotans views of the Ku Klux Klan also changed significantly, from largely viewing them as traitorous, cowardly insurrectionists to being upholders of law and order when the state was unable to provide it due to the spreading of Lost Cause rhetoric from the south. Finally, during World War I, vigilantes targeted people who belonged to left-wing groups such as the Nonpartisan League or the Industrial Workers of the World.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicAmerican History and CultureFrench-language works237,207