MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044024840

Untersuchung der Interpretation und Nutzung kontroverser ernährungs-, umwelt- und ethikbezogener Evidenz im Zusammenhang mit Lebensmitteln durch den Verbraucher

2025· dissertation· de· W7044024840 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuemediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConsumer behavior in food and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterTechnische Universität MünchenUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)Perspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)Empirical evidence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores the role of moral aspects in explaining consumers’ interpretation and use of contested nutritional, environmental and ethical evidence regarding food. After building a conceptual framework (Chapter 2), Chapters 3 and 4 investigate the topic from an empirical perspective across two countries, Germany and Canada. Results show the importance of considering moral aspects when studying consumer attitudes and decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemediaTUM (Technical University of Munich)Same topicConsumer behavior in food and healthFrench-language works237,207