The Virtual Reconstruction of the Sculpted Vestibule of the Sanctuary of Soknebtunis at Tebtunis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent archival discoveries both in Italy and Canada are contributing to our knowledge and the database of old unpublished excavations at Tebtunis in the Fayum. In February 1931, Carlo Anti and Gilbert Bagnani discovered the sculpted proastion or vestibule of the Ptolemaic sanctuary of the crocodile god Sobek, or Soknebtunis as he was called locally. Although there were terrestrial photos of the sculpted reliefs covering its walls, the plans of the excavation architect Fausto Franco have only recently been found in the Istituto Veneto. Similarly, Bagnani’s detailed report examining and identifying the reliefs, together with a paper that he presented at a conference at Leiden in September 1931, have recently been discovered among the archives at Trent University in Peterborough, Canada. Combining all this newly available data with computer analysis of the plans and aerial photos and GIS has enabled the virtual reconstruction in 3D of the sculpted vestibule of the sanctuary of the oracular Soknebtunis at Tebtunis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".