Viladům Masarykova quarter - Brno
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The topic of the bachelor thesis is the new building of the villa in Masaryk district in Brno. The study is based on the previous subject AG032. The aim of the thesis is the elaboration of the design study up to the project documentation for the execution of the construction. The villa is located on the corner of Helcelet and Roubalov streets. The building site is smaller, hillside and it has irregular shape. The building site is used for housing. On the building site there is an older family house that will be demolished. The surrounding built-up area is characterized by family houses and apartment buildings. The villa has four above-ground floors and one underground floor with a collective garage and appropriate home furnishings. There will be one magnanimous apartment on each floor. The material is distinctive in a simple form. It is geometrically defined as a cuboid. The height of the object respects the height line of the surrounding built-up area. The overall appearance of the building completes the carved loggia, connecting the two sides of the house. The design of the villa is adapter to the hillside sloping terrain. The land is used in the building so that the lowest point of the building site serves as an entry into the underground garage. And the highest place of the building site serves as a barrier-free entrance to the building.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.162 | 0.083 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".