Výběr kvalifikovaných zahraničních pracovníků v kontextu ekonomické migrace
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legal economic migration is playing increasingly important role within a unified Europe. The goal of the thesis is to analyze programs implemented to manage legal economic migration and to evaluate their impact on the countries involved and on migrants themselves. The thesis follows the origins and the development of collective migration policy in the EU, it analyzes distinct phases of its implementation, including the Haag programme, the Tamper Programme and the Lisabon Strategy. More specifically, the thesis follows the progress of a Czech pilot project "Selection of Qualified Foreign Workers" and discusses whether it is sufficiently well evaluated and established to serve as a basic tool for the management of permanent economic immigration. The impact of information campaign realized as part of the project is evaluated with a goal to determine whether it reached its target audience. The thesis also examines similar programs for temporary or permanent economic immigration implemented in Germany, Poland, the USA, Canada and the "green card" program for the temporary economic migration in the Czech Republic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it