Vulnérabilité et aptitude rapport espagnol: questionnaire rélatif au thème nº1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’une des missions principales du droit en général, et du droit privé en particulier, réside dans sa capacité de protéger les personnes vulnérables contre toute forme d’exploitation. Cette mission interpelle, plus que jamais, les différents systèmes juridiques, tous confrontés à des phénomènes de limitation des ressources, de vieillissement de la population et d’écarts croissants de richesses des divers acteurs économiques et sociaux. Ces journées ont pour objectif, de manière comparative, pragmatique et multidisciplinaire, de mettre en lumière ces enjeux et les solutions que les différents systèmes juridiques apportent. Séance 1 (Université de Montréal, 28 mai 2018) : Vulnérabilité et aptitude Protection des personnes dont l’aptitude à prendre une décision libre et éclairée pose des enjeux : acte juridique et capacité, responsabilité et faculté de discernement, exploitation des personnes âgées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".