MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7044130304

WINDOW STRIKE BIRD MORTALITY ON THEUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA – LINCOLN CITY CAMPUS

2020· article· en· W7044130304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrushSalt lakeUniversity campusQuarter (Canadian coin)Window (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On May 25, 1915, in Lincoln, Lancaster County, Nebraska, a Gray-cheeked Thrush was “killed by flying against the library building on city campus” and was found by Robert H. Wolcott and prepared as a scientific study skin by Leroy M. Gates. This thrush is now ZM-6674 in the University of Nebraska State Museum (UNSM) Zoology collections. Birds are typically killed at low level buildings by flying into windows. This thrush is the first documented window strike death for what is now the University of Nebraska – Lincoln city campus. Based upon the UNSM bird collections I report on the last 100+ years (1915 through Dec 2019) of window strike bird mortalities on the city campus (especially 1985-2019). There were a total of 980 specimens of 87 species from 39 separate buildings or building complexes. The University of Nebraska State Museum (UNSM) Division of Zoology collections database was examined for avian specimens salvaged from city campus and whose label data indicated they had died, or very likely died, as a result of striking a window. For the purposes of this project the city campus was defined as being bounded on the east by Antelope Valley Parkway, the south by ‘Q’ Street, the west by 10th Street and what is now Interstate 180, and on the north by what is now Salt Creek Roadway and the approximate location of ‘X’ Street. Only specimens salvaged from university-related buildings within those boundaries were included. The campus has changed markedly over the past 100 years. In 1915 it was only beginning to expand beyond the original four city blocks from 10th to 12th Streets and ‘R’ to ‘T’ Streets. Some specimens had a street address recorded and when that could be determined to be a university building, it was included. Building, or building complexes, are recorded in the Appendix using the current name of the building. If questions arose from the database concerning the specimen, the specimen’s original label was consulted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→