Vulnerabilidad e incidencia de la pobreza hídrica en Alicante
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La pobreza hídrica es un fenómeno reciente surgido en los países desarrollados, de carácter urbano y entendido como la dificultad de los hogares para hacer frente al gasto en el consumo del agua. Mientras que en un principio se consideró en esta situación a aquellos hogares que destinaban una parte significativa de sus ingresos a este fin, en los países mediterráneos ha llegado a suponer un problema hasta el punto de que numerosos hogares afronten los recibos con dificultad, o incluso se produzcan impagos. Esta investigación pretende abordar este fenómeno mediante el estudio de caso de la ciudad de Alicante (España), tratando de solventar en primer lugar la dificultad de localizarlo en el espacio urbano. Medir y analizar la vulnerabilidad ante esta pobreza en las diferentes áreas de la ciudad a partir de datos públicos, comprobar su validez mediante el empleo de datos de incidencia (impagos) de la empresa Aguas de Alicante. Y, finalmente, analizar la evolución de la incidencia tras la crisis de 2008 y la generada por la COVID-19, al igual que la magnitud de la misma. Todo ello, contribuyendo a su vez a dar visibilidad a este fenómeno, cuyo estudio es incipiente en España.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".