MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044164161

Une approche participative pour évaluer les risques et les opportunités touristiques dans un contexte climatique en évolution au Québec (Canada)

2017· article· fr· W7044164161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodHyporeflexiaTSG101DiafiltrationArticular cartilage damageDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kate Germain Kate co-coordonne le programme Tourisme (changements climatiques) à partir de la Chaire de tourisme Transat de l’ESG UQAM en partenariat avec Ouranos. Elle détient 10 ans d’expérience en recherche appliquée et en veille stratégique en tourisme. Elle est diplômée en administration des affaires, spécialisation tourisme et en gestion de l’environnement. Claude Péloquin Directeur des études à la Chaire de tourisme Transat de l’ESG UQAM, Claude Péloquin compte 20 ans d’expérience dans l’industrie touristique. Nommé subséquemment directeur et 2e vice-président au sein du conseil d’administration de TTRA Canada de 2012 à 2014, il est aussi diplômé à double titre en gestion du tourisme et de l'hôtellerie ainsi qu'en administration des affaires, concentration finance. Stéphanie Bleau Au sein d’Ouranos, un consortium de recherche sur les changements climatiques, elle co-coordonne les programmes Tourisme et Environnement nordique. Elle détient une maitrise en sciences de l'eau de l'Institut national de la recherche scientifique à Québec. Ses expériences professionnelles en milieu nordique, en planification d’évènements urbains majeurs, en tourisme hivernal et côtier lui confèrent une expertise d’affaires diversifiée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)Same topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207