MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044442659

Этнокультура украинцев Казахстана

2013· article· en· W7044442659 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe scientific electronic library of periodicals of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Linguistics and Anthropology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianAdaptation (eye)Folk cultureAction (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the peculiarities of the ethnocultural processes in the Ukrainian villages around Pavlodar (northeastern Kazakhstan); they were observed by the authoress due to her private expedition to that Ukrainian-populated region. The journey’s objectives were to retrace the time history of a populace’s traditional culture, to ascertain a new environment adaptation level, to examine the opinions on the post-Soviet society and the changes in newly established nation states, and to draw the Ukrainian-Canadian parallels. While gaining information during the expedition, the authoress succeeded in observing the illustrations of maintenance of language, separate constituents of traditional culture (such as family and calendar rites, folk medicine, folk costumes, handicrafts, and trades, etc.) within the region under study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.058
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0070.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it