MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044604596

ポリ乳酸における成形加工条件と力学特性の関係

2016· dissertation· en· W7044604596 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsRelation (database)Component (thermodynamics)Work (physics)Term (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among biodegradable polymers, poly(lactic acid) PLA has received much attention in recent years.PLA is a polymer obtained from renewable resource.PLA shows high rigidity, high transparency, good biocompatibility, good gas-barrier properties, and optical activity.It is generally understood that PLA shows similar mechanical properties to polystyrene.Moreover, a recent development of the production method enhances the cost-performance greatly.Therefore, PLA is a candidate to replace of petroleum-based plasics.However, for a practical usage, considerable efforts will be further required to overcome the following defects; poor melt elasticity, slow crystallization rate, and mechanical brittleness.In order to enhance the properties of PLA and extending its applicable fields, a number of researches will have to be conducted.In this thesis, effect of the addition of poly(ethylene glycol) terminated by benzoate PEG-BA on the crystallization behavior and dynamic mechanical properties of PLA is studied as compared with poly(ethylene glycol) PEG-OH.It is found that PEG-BA is miscible with PLA and shows good plasticizing effect.Because PEG-OH having the same degree of polymerization is immiscible with PLA, the end group in PEG-BA, i.e., benzoate, plays an important role in the miscibility.Furthermore, PEG-BA does not induce the PLA degradation at melt-processing, whereas PEG-OH leads to the hydrolysis degradation.Finally, the addition of PEG-BA pronounces the crystallization rate of PLA at low crystallization temperatures and thus enhances the degree of crystallinity at conventional processing.Consequently, the temperature dependence of dynamic mechanical properties is similar to that for isotactic polypropylene.Moreover, the effect of processing conditions on mechanical properties of amorphous PLA is studied considering the chain packing.It is found that the samples cooled in the temperature range from 60 to 80 ° C, that is, slightly higher than the glass transition temperature T g , shows ductile behavior with a low brittle-ductile transition temperature.Furthermore, the samples obtained by prolonged cooling at 56 ° C also show ductile behavior, whereas a shorter cooling period at the same temperature provides a brittle product.Even for the samples quenched at 40 ° C, they shows ductile behavior after the exposure to post processing annealing operation at 60 ° C; that is, the strain at break is larger than 300 %.This is an anomalous phenomenon for a glassy polymer.The dynamic mechanical analysis and thermal characterization revealed that the ductile samples show slightly higher T g than the brittle ones, presumably due to high packing density of polymer chains.Moreover, it is found from infrared spectroscopy that the ductile samples show strong absorbance at 1267 cm -1 , ascribed to high energy gauche-gauche gg conformers.Following the classic Robertson's descriptions of plastic flow, it is concluded that the increase in the gauche-gauche gg conformers, which shows the conformation change under a low stress level, reduces the critical onset stress for shear yielding, leading to ductile deformation.The results demonstrate that the mechanical toughness of PLA can be controlled by the cooling conditions during processing and the post-processing annealing operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207