The Agbiotech Bulletin, Volume 3, Issue 3, March 1995
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Agbiotech Bulletin Volume 3, Issue 3, March 1995 Code Number: NL95018 Size of Files: Text: 60K No associated graphics files Intellectual Property and Biotechnology Advantages and disadvantages What can be protected? News Biofermentation Facility a Plus for Saskatoon's Agbiotech Sector Agri-Food Innovation Fund in Formative Stage The Global Agricultural Biotechnology Association Bio-control for Scentless Chamomile Evaluated Tender Out for New Triticale New Flax Named - Solin Barley Stem Rust Research Renewed Study to Lead to Long Term Swine Genetics Project Potatoes Benefit from Biotech Additional Flavr Savr Tomato Line Non regulated Trends The Future of Agriculture Education Canola Oils the Wheels of the Farm Economy Alliances News AHFMR-Synsorb Deal to Finance Trials NRC & NSERC Collaborate on University Tech Finance Expanded Role for Western Economic Diversification Recommended New Authority to Oversee Alta Research Thinking Like an Investor Attitudes Maritimers Receptive to Transgenic Foods Australians Positive About Genetic Engineering Publicity vs Advertising Vox Populi Legal Notes New Canadian Plant Breeder Rights Patent Information Searches Available Resources Biotechnology Report 1994-95 A Primer on Biotechnology Canadian Forum for Biological Control Ottawa Life Sciences Research Technology Park NAPPO Big Ideas for Small Business Biopesticide Regulation Symposium Cell & Molecular Biology Courses Offered Summer Biotech Institute North Carolina Bioscience Initiative for Minorities Ag Biotech in Mexico People Watch Alta Genetics AgrEvo Agriculture Canada Biocode Canada-ASEAN Centre Canadian Beef Improvement IRAP - Industrial Research Assistance Program. Marusyk Bourassa Milton PENCE PENCE is a federal government and industry supported network of 53 senior scientists at university, government and private laboratories across Canada. Saskatchewan Science Centre Spectral Diagnostics StressGen UBC Industry Liaison University of Guelph
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.341 | 0.377 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".